Reed v. Cross
California Supreme Court
Cross appeals by the plaintiff and defendant from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. J. W. McKinley, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
In this case a judgment was entered in the court below by which it was adjudged: 1. That plaintiff was not entitled to take anything upon the cause of action set forth in his complaint; 2. That defendant, John Cross, do have and recover nothing of and from F. C. Reed, upon the said defendant’s cross-complaint; 3. That defendant recover his costs, amounting to the sum of $19.95.
Plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment as denies his right of recovery against the defendant, and awards costs against him. His appeal is supported by a bill of exceptions.
The defendant also prosecutes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Garwood v. GarwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Caperton v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Woolverton v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wiese v. San Francisco Musical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by19 opinions
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Kegley v. KegleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hardy v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.