Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Police Officers for Equal Rights v. Lashutka

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1995No. 95-603PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This is yet another in a series of cases involving public records. While we have, time and time again, informed public officials and public agencies of their duties pursuant to R.C. 149.43 (to release records in their possession, which records clearly belong to the public), we, nevertheless, continue to see obfuscation, cunctation, delay and even arrogance in far too many cases. This case is a good example.

Relators have requested that respondents provide certain records maintained by the Columbus Department of Public Safety, Division of Police. In response to their request, relators received…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Hensley v. NowakOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. Safety (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API