People v. Hatch
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and from an order denying a new trial. «T. R. Welch, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The defendant was charged by indictment under section 506 of the Penal Code with having embezzled on the seventeenth day of February, 1908, the sum of $37,075.42 of the money of Sarah E. Sage, intrusted to him and in his control and custody as the agent, attorney and trustee of said Sarah E. Sage. He was found guilty as charged, and made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and judgment pronounced. From the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial he in due time appealed to this court.
Defendant at the proper time made a motion to set aside the indictment on various grounds…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. StallingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Agar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. MaddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.