Legal Opinion

People v. Anthony

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1921No. Crim. No. 2312PublishedCited by 66 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of lewd and lascivious acts done upon the body of a female child under the age of fourteen years, with the intent to arouse and appeal to his own sexual desires, contrary to the provisions of section 288 of the Penal Code. He appeals from the judgment.

A reversal is asked upon three grounds, as follows: (1) Misconduct of the district attorney during the trial; (2) the refusal to give an instruction requested by the defendant; (3) the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict of conviction.

The third ground was not pressed upon the argument.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. People v. RangodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. CurrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. People v. LiggettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. People v. FraysierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API