Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fortas
Two cases, consolidated by the trial court and raising related issues, are here involved. In United States v. Cargill, Inc., the Government asked that parties responsible for the allegedly negligent sinking of a vessel in an inland waterway be declared responsible for removing the impediment to navigation thus created. In United States v. Wyandotte Transportation Co. the United States had itself removed a sunken vessel; claiming that the vessel had been negligently sunk, it sought reimbursement for the costs of removal. The question now before us for decision is whether the relief requested…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by360 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
355 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.