Legal Opinion
Wright v. Apikian
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 29, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover compensation for breach by the defendant of the terms of a written agreement between the parties relative to the remodeling of an apartment house. This case was tried together with another case between the same parties wherein the present defendant sought to recover for a balance alleged to be due for work and materials furnished under the same written agreement, and for extras. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff in each case. Apikian filed a motion for a new trial in each case.
The grounds for a new trial alleged in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Mills v. Magee Carpet Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Peirson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Parker v. Lewis J. Bird Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Tildsley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Macchiaroli v. HowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Perry v. Manufacturers National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Friend Lumber Co. v. Armstrong Building Finish Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Low Supply Co. v. PappacostopoulousMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Dziegiel v. Town of WestfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.