Legal Opinion
Low Supply Co. v. Pappacostopoulous
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 11, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These two actions founded on the same contract to install a heating system were tried together before a jury. The first action is brought by the Low Supply Company as plaintiff to recover the balance due for the heating-apparatus on an account annexed. The defendant in that action pleaded general denial, payment, and special denial of three items in the account. The second action is by the defendant in the first action against the plaintiff in that action. The declaration sets out a contract by the defendant to install a heating plant on the premises of the plaintiff, negligent installation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Loveland v. RandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Freeman v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Produce Exchange Trust Co. v. BieberbachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Pritchard v. MabreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. MaguireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Beverly Hospital v. EarlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Arena v. John P. Squire Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.