Legal Opinion
Macchiaroli v. Howell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 31, 1936PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These two cases, arising out of substantially the same facts and tried together to a jury, are presented by a single bill of exceptions touching the second trial of the cases. The declaration in each case contained two counts, the first alleging that the plaintiff’s intestate received injuries from which he died through the negligence of the defendant, and the second alleging injuries and conscious suffering from the same cause. A verdict was directed for the defendant on the second count in each case. That is not before us. These exceptions relate to the first count. That count was submitted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Boott Mills v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Brooks v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Gaudette v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Kowalski v. GagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Mone v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.