Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Challenge-Cook Brothers of Ohio, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1988No. 87-5153PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Chief Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) petitions for enforcement of its decision and order, published at 282 NLRB No. 2 (1986), finding Challenge-Cook Brothers of Ohio, Inc. (the employer) in violation of § 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board entered a cease and desist order, and affirmatively required the employer to bargain upon request with the United Steelworkers of America (the union) over the effects on employees of the transfer of work from a plant in Bryan, Ohio to one in Calhoun, Georgia.
Aside from one matter not pursued on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northside Realty Associates, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The Timken Roller Bearing Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Federal Compress & Warehouse Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- East Richland Education Ass'n v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- County of Los Alamos v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Technologies Corporation, and District 91, Lamaw, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Lodge 700, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, and United Technologies Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.