Legal Opinion

County of Los Alamos v. Martinez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2011No. 29,085PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANZI, Judge.

{1} In this appeal, we review the district court’s order denying Plaintiffs, County of Los Alamos (County), motion for summary judgment and granting Intervenor’s, Los Alamos Firefighters Association Local #3279 (Union), cross-motion for summary judgment. The district court determined that paramedic training contracts are subjects of mandatory bargaining and that the County may not unilaterally enter into such contracts with Union members without including the Union in its negotiations. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the district court.

BACKGROUND

{2}…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Communication Workers of Am. v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Armijo v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Communication Workers of Am. v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API