Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1944No. Crim. 4503PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Defendant Jones and Charles Ivan Baa were jointly tried and convicted under an information charging murder, conspiracy to commit robbery, and robbery. A judgment imposing the death penalty on Baa was affirmed in People v. Baa, ante, p.- [150 P.2d 1]. Defendant being only seventeen years of age at the time of the commission of the offenses was sentenced to life imprisonment. (See Pen. Code, § 190.)

Tom Din Toy, a Chinese, was robbed and shot about 1:30 o’clock on the morning of October 5, 1942, as he entered the hallway of the Service Hotel in San Diego. Two men were seen to follow Toy into the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People v. LisenbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. DabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API