Legal Opinion

People v. Cahill

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1993No. S020126PublishedCited by 225 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

For a number of years, decisions of both the United States Supreme Court and this court have held that whenever a “coerced” or “involuntary” confession has been received in evidence at a criminal trial, “automatic reversal” of the conviction is required, without regard to the strength of the additional evidence received, unrelated to the confession, that tends to establish the defendant’s guilt. (See, e.g., Payne v. Arkansas (1958) 356 U.S. 560, 568 [2 L.Ed.2d 975, 981, 78 S.Ct. 844]; People v. Berve (1958) 51 Cal.2d 286, 290 [332 P.2d 97]; People v. Trout (1960) 54 Cal.2d…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by225 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API