Legal Opinion

People v. Lisenba

California Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1939No. Crim. 4068PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This cause is before this court on rehearing. In the former opinion (People v. Lisenba, (Cal.) 89 Pac. (2d) 39) every point then raised by appellant was discussed. On further consideration of this appeal, we are of the opinion that the proper conclusions were reached in said former opinion on all points then raised. We therefore adopt said opinion as a part of this opinion upon rehearing. Said former opinion follows:

“In an indictment returned by the grand jury of Los Angeles county, Major Raymond Lisenba (also known as Robert S. James and who will be referred to as the defendant),…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. SiemsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. NorthcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Scott v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. DurhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API