Legal Opinion
New Jersey Mortgage & Investment Co. v. Dorsey
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 14, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Conford, J. A. D.
This is an action on a negotiable promissory note by a holder in due course thereof against the maker. The note had been given to U. S. Homes, trading as National Homes, a firm in the business of home improvement, in connection with a contract to do certain improvements on the defendants’ home. The note was for $2,435.40, payable in 60 monthly installments of $40.59, and plaintiff had purchased it the day after its execution for $1,800. At the trial, the defendants undertook to prove that at the time they signed the note it was blank…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Freedley v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Gardner v. RubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Zier v. Eastern Acceptance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lampley v. Davis MacH. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Carnegie Bank v. ShalleckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Toker v. PerlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.