Burchett v. Allied Concord Financial Corp.(Del.)
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
Plaintiffs-appellees filed separate complaints to have certain notes and mortgages held by defendant-appellant cancelled and declared void. The cases were consolidated below and on this appeal, which is from the judgments voiding the instruments.
The facts; except for one small detail, are the same. It seems that a man named Kelly represented himself as selling Kaiser aluminum siding for a firm named Consolidated Products of Roswell. None of the parties knew Kelly, nor had they seen him before. In each case, Kelly talked to the husband and wife (appellees) at their homes,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curtis v. CurtisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- United States v. TholenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
- United States v. CastilloDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1954
- Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Amato v. FULLINGTON ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- First State Bank at Gallup v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Dumais v. American Golf Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2001
- In Re AnthonyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. JaroszewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.