Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1886No. 11164PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, and from an order denying a new trial.

We are of opinion the judgment and order should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the learned judge who decided the case in the court below on the rendition of 'judgment, and which are as follows:—

“This is an action on a promissory note for twenty-seven thousand dollars, executed by defendant September 4, 1876, payable four months after date, and bearing *256interest at ten per cent per annum from maturity. The original holder of the note was the National Bank of the State of Missouri.
“At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Curtis v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Boehm v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Roth v. MoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API