Legal Opinion

Acme Markets, Inc. v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1994PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge.

Acme Markets, Inc., appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County on December 21,1993, which granted Federal Armored Express, Inc. (“Federal”) summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse that order and remand the matter for further proceedings.

The procedural history of this case may be summarized as follows. On November 20, 1990, appellant filed a breach of contract complaint against Federal. In that complaint, appellant alleged that the parties had entered into a contract for armored car service and that the agreement later…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Lilley v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Phico Insurance v. Presbyterian Medical Services Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. SBC Interactive, Inc. v. Corporate Media PartnersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  4. Keystone Technology Group, Inc. v. Kerr Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Harrity v. Medical College of Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API