Keystone Technology Group, Inc. v. Kerr Group, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
TODD, J.:
¶ 1 Keystone Technology Group, Inc. (“Keystone”) appeals the January 9, 2002 Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County denying its motion to compel arbitration.1 Upon review, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
¶ 2 The facts and procedural history of this action, as set forth in this Court’s prior memorandum, are as follows:
This matter arises out of a dispute between the parties involving an agreement for the sale of land. In October of 2000, the parties entered into an agreement whereby Appellant agreed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Samuel J. Marranca General Contracting Co. v. Amerimar Cherry Hill Associates Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Acme Markets, Inc. v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Highmark Inc. v. Hospital Service Ass'n of Northeastern PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Goral v. Fox Ridge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Smay v. E.R. Stuebner, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Stumpf v. NyeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- LSI Title Agency, Inc. v. Evaluation Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Zimmer v. CooperNeff Advisors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Quiles v. Financial Exchange Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.