Schwartz v. Rockey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
This appeal involves a civil action initiated by home purchasers against the sellers for fraudulent non-disclosure and/or concealment of water infiltration. The questions presented concern whether the purchasers/plaintiffs made an election of remedies that foreclosed rescission, and whether a finding of outrageous or egregious conduct is required to support an award of treble damages in a private action under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.
In March 2001, Appellees Richard and Melanie Schwartz (“Buyers”), commenced the underlying action against…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Weinberg v. Sun Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Hunt v. United States Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Umbelina v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Nutter v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Meyer v. Community College of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.