Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Rockey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2007No. 35, 36 WAP 2006PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

This appeal involves a civil action initiated by home purchasers against the sellers for fraudulent non-disclosure and/or concealment of water infiltration. The questions presented concern whether the purchasers/plaintiffs made an election of remedies that foreclosed rescission, and whether a finding of outrageous or egregious conduct is required to support an award of treble damages in a private action under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.

In March 2001, Appellees Richard and Melanie Schwartz (“Buyers”), commenced the underlying action against…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Weinberg v. Sun Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Hunt v. United States Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Umbelina v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Nutter v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Meyer v. Community College of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API