Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1991No. C3-91-893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Lois Johnson and husband (appellant) filed suit against the State of Minnesota alleging negligence for failing to repair a raised sidewalk joint on a sidewalk leading to a travel information center located at a highway rest area. The trial court granted summary judgment based upon governmental immunity under Minn.Stat. § 3.736, subd. 3(h) (1990) and procedural grounds. The procedural grounds were appellants’ failure to file a statement of disputed facts as required by Rule 15, Special Rules of Court, Seventh Judicial District.

FACTS

On February 9, 1989, appellant stopped…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Nieting v. BlondellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Hickman v. Group Health Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fear v. Independent School District 911Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Georgia Department of Transportation v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Schaffer v. Spirit Mountain Recreation Area AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, and the Class of Beneficiaries, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 573.02 v. The City of Stillwater, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  5. Zacharias v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API