Legal Opinion
Adamowski v. Bard
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 9, 1952No. Nos. 10499, 10500, and 10587PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The answer to a single question presented by the three suits at bar, two original proceedings in mandamus and an appeal from the court below denying relief in the nature of mandamus,1 disposes of all three cases. The allegations of the Adamowski petition, No. 10,499 are typical.
Adamowski, a seaman employed in the United States Merchant Marine, sued Gulf Oil Corporation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (C.A. No. 9,386) to recover damages, wages, and maintenance and cure because of injuries and disability allegedly sustained by him…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Bainbridge v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Roland E. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Humberto Silva Araya v. Clayburne A. McLelland United States MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Clay v. Overseas Carriers Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Glenn v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Savelis v. VlachosDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.