Legal Opinion

United States v. National City Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1949No. 269MPublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson

The issue here is whether the 1948 revision of the Judicial Code (Title 28, United States Code) extends the doctrine of jorum non conveniens to antitrust suits. The Government’s complaint in this civil suit alleged that respondent corporations have conspired to obtain control of local transportation companies in at least 44 cities in 16 states in different sections of the country, in order to restrain and monopolize interstate commerce in busses and the petroleum and other supplies incident thereto, in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U. S. C. §§ 1, 2.

This is the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok PoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1949

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Wallace v. JaffreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API