Legal Opinion
Porterfield v. Webb
California Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1924No. Docket No. L.A. 8214PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Appeal from a judgment of dismissal after a general demurrer sustained to the complaint without leave to amend.
Plaintiff Porterfield, a citizen and resident of the county of Los Angeles, this state, and an owner of agricultural land situate in said county of Los Angeles, 'and his coplaintiff Mizuno, a resident of this state, but bom of Japanese parents in Japan and a subject of the emperor of that country, being mutually desirous of entering into a cropping contract for the planting, cultivating, and harvesting of garden produce for the market and the growing of such other crops as the owner…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Webb v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Porterfield v. Webb, Attorney General of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Frick v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.