Legal Opinion
St. Louis County Attorney's Office v. Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Three & 01/100 Dollars ($24,643.01) in Various Denominations of U.S. Currency
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 13, 1994No. C0-94-1076PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Respondent Robert Kervina was convicted in federal court of federal gambling violations arising out of his operation of an illegal gambling business in Minnesota. The St. Louis County Attorney filed a complaint in' state court seeking forfeiture of cash and video poker machines allegedly used in respondent’s gambling business. The trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that forfeiture under the governing state statute depends on a gambling conviction under Minnesota law. We affirm.
FACTS
Prior to October 1989, respondent Robert Kervina…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of New Hope v. 1986 Mazda 626, License No. POC147Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Adkins v. 1979 Midas R.V.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- City of Golden Valley v. One 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix, Vin 1g2wp521wf309530, Pennsylvania License Plate P520111Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- City of New Hope v. 1986 Mazda 626, License No. POC147Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. BistodeauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998