Legal Opinion
City of New Hope v. 1986 Mazda 626, License No. POC147
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 1996No. C6-95-1688Published
1Opinion of the Court
546 N.W.2d 300 (1996)
CITY OF NEW HOPE, Appellant,
v.
1986 MAZDA 626, LICENSE NO. POC147, Respondent.
No. C6-95-1688.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 16, 1996.
Martin P. Malecha, Corrick & Sondrall, P.A., Assistant New Hope City Attorney, Brooklyn Park, for appellant.
Richard J. Haefele, Chaska, Heidi M. Schmid, Shorewood, for respondent.
Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and LANSING and KLAPHAKE, JJ.
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
The City of New Hope (city) appeals the trial court's dismissal of its motor vehicle forfeiture action brought under Minn.Stat. § 169.1217 (1994). The trial court…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.