Legal Opinion
Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 16, 1993No. C7-93-402PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This appeal is taken from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent Musicland on its claim brought pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA) and from the grant of summary judgment to Musicland on appellant Control Data’s MERLA counterclaim. Control Data further challenges the damages and attorney fees awarded to Musicland pursuant to MERLA. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
In 1969, Control Data bought a manufacturing facility in St. Louis Park. The facility was used for the manufacture of printed…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Dedham Water Company v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Control Data Corp. v. S.C.S.C. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Minnesota v. Kalman W. Abrams Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Northern Pacific Center, Inc. v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Yath v. Fairview Clinics, N. P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.