State v. Peters

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress, arguing that she was subject to an unlawfully-extended traffic stop. In reviewing a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we are bound by the trial court’s explicit and implicit findings, if there is sufficient evidence in the record. State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 74-75, 854 P2d 421 (1993). We review as a matter of law the trial court’s application of legal principles to those facts. Id. We affirm.

We summarize…