Legal Opinion

Bakke v. Keller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1945No. 33,995PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

Action for specific performance to compel defendant to convey an undivided one-half interest in certain real property in Minneapolis and for an accounting in connection therewith. The court made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant on February 23, 1944. On March 28, 1944, the court amended certain of the findings but denied plaintiff’s motion for amended conclusions of law or for a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on November 10, 1944.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiff, a real estate broker in the city of Minneapolis, on August 17,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Diedrick v. HelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Sonnesyn v. HawbakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Stong v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cady v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Berryman v. RiegertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. PMH PROPERTIES v. NicholsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank of WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API