Legal Opinion

Reed v. Lammel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for McLeod county, Edson, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtYanderburoh, J.

This action is for the value of buildings alleged to have been wrongfully removed from plain tiff’s premises, and for the use and occupation thereof by defendant. He had previously recovered judgment in an action of ejectment against the defendant, in which action the title was finally adjudged- to be in him. The substance of the defence is that the defendant erected the buildings upon the land in good faith, under color of title, and having good reason to believe that the title to the same had vested in him, without any notice of any adverse claim, and that he was accordingly entitled to…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lufkin v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DokkoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Cannon Falls Holding Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Central States Investment Co. v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Zakrzewski v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API