Legal Opinion

State v. Beagles

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 1996No. 94-09-6993-C2; CA A89124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants are charged with multiple offenses related to controlled substances. The state appeals from an order granting their pretrial motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. ORS 138.060(3). It argues that the trial court erred in determining that the warrant failed to meet the particularity requirement of ORS 133.565(2)(c). We reverse and remand.

According to the information in the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant, officers received a tip from an anonymous caller that defendant Beagles’ residence contained a large quantity of methamphetamine and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. SargentOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MansorWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. ThibodeauxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. GlosterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. Pelster/BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. Pelster/BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API