Legal Opinion
State v. Blackburn
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1973PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*30HOLMAN, J.
These two criminal cases were consolidated for hearing both in the trial court and in the Court of Appeals. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to suppress on the ground that the search warrant under which evidence was seized failed to describe the place to be searched with sufficient particularity. The state appealed and the Court of Appeals reversed. State v. Blackburn/Barber, 10 Or App 564, 499 P2d 1325 (1972). We granted the petition for review.
Determination of the legality of searches depends largely upon the facts of each ease,① and for this reason evidence adduced at…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. BershchanskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. MansorOregon Supreme Court · 2018
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.