State v. Mansor
Washington County Circuit Court, Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
HASELTON, S. J.
Defendant, who was convicted of multiple offenses, including murder by abuse, ORS 163.115(1)(c), following the death of his infant son, appeals. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to suppress material discovered as the result of a warranted search of his home computers, and (2) admitting evidence of a medical diagnosis of “abusive head trauma.”1 As amplified below, we conclude that the warrant authorizing the seizure and forensic examination of defendant’s home computers was imper-missibly overbroad, violating the particularity requirement…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MansorOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. TurayOregon Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. SavathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. PayeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.