State v. Ingram

The issue in this criminal case is whether the search warrant, pursuant to which defendant’s vehicle was searched, complied with the requirements of ORS 133.565(2)(b) 1 and Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, 2 for particularity. Defendant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine, a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He contends that the trial court erred in not suppressing evidence seized during the execution of the allegedly deficient search warrant. The Court of Appeals held that the search warrant was sufficient and affirmed the trial court. State v. Ingram, 104 Or…