Creecy v. Joy
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Action on a promissory note by A. T. Creecy against R. Z. Joy. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean
This is an action on a promissory note. The complaint, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: ‘ ‘ That on or about the sixteenth day of June, 1893, the above named defendant and one J. M. Joy, for value’ received, made, executed, and delivered to this plaintiff their certain joint and several promissory note in writing, bearing date June 16, 1893, whereby and wherein the said R. Z. Joy and J. M. Joy jointly and severally promised and agreed to pay to the order of this plaintiff the sum of $165.50 in United States gold coin, with interest thereon in like gold coin at the rate of eight per…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kipp v. SilvermanMontana Supreme Court · 1901
- Currey v. ButcherOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Baker City v. MurphyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Houghton & Palmer v. BeckOregon Supreme Court · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Cooper v. Hillsboro Garden TractsOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Duby v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Patterson v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Buckman v. Hill Military AcademyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.