State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
MARSHALL, J.:
An opinion in these cases was filed November 10, 1923. A rehearing has been granted, and the opinion filed has not¿ been published. The entire case has been reexamined and reconsidered, and this opinion is filed to take the place of the one filed in November.
The former opinion contained language which has been understood as a criticism of the public utilities commission. The court did not intend to criticize the commission; and, for that reason, the language whch has been misunderstood is withdrawn.
In case No. 23,988, the state, on the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re New England Tel. & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- So. Bell T. T. Co. v. Georgia Pub. Ser. Comm.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1948
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.