Duby v. Hicks
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
The defendant contends that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of suit. The plaintiffs contend that the complaint is good after decree and this is the only question necessary for decision.
*30A complaint which seeks to foreclose a lien must affirmatively allege the facts upon which the validity of the lien depends. “It must affirmatively appear from the complaint that the notice filed contained all the essential provisions required by statute; that it was proper in form, verified as required and filed within the time prescribed.” Pilz v. Killingsworth, 20 Or. 432,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- McCall v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Pilz v. KillingsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1891
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Gray v. Hammond Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Nicholson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Columbia Auto Works, Inc. v. YatesOregon Supreme Court · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.