Hoyt v. Upper Marion Ditch Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
Appeal by defendant Lemon and his wife only, from a judgment against them as indorsers on a note and for foreclosure of a pledge of shares of stock given to secure their obligation as indorsers. On June 25,1929, the Upper Marion Ditch Company made and delivered to W. H. Lemon, or order, its promissory note for $3,420. The note provided: “The makers and endorsers of this note each expressly waive demand, notice of non-payment and protest, and suit against the maker.” The note was executed with a printed form as the base. Typewritten thereon was the following: “950 shares of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gaumer v. SnedekerIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Mann v. WhitelyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
- Coburn v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- National Bank of Commerce v. James Pingree Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
- Hammond v. WallUtah Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Chesney v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- Madsen v. Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Reader v. District Court of Fourth Judicial DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Madsen v. PRUDENTIAL FED. SAV. & L. ASS'NUtah Supreme Court · 1977