Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Wall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1917No. 3167PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Habeas corpus by L. I. Hammond against I. 0. Wall.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

The plaintiff, hereinafter called petitioner, filed his petition in this court, in which he alleged that he was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the above-named defendant, who is the sheriff of Wasatch County, Utah. 'The petition was filed November 13, 1917, in which the cause of detention was set forth. Thereafter, and before the hearing, petitioner filed an amendment to the petition in which the cause of the alleged illegality of the detention was more fully set forth. A writ of habeas corpus was duly issued as prayed, to which the defendant made return as provided by our statute.

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gottling v. P.R. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. RouseUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Beach v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Mickelson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API