Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1977No. 14530PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

On appeal is a summary judgment granted to defendant, hereafter Prudential, against plaintiffs, hereafter Madsen or trustors. The action is founded upon terms of a deed of trust; and was brought to determine the status of the parties, and the legal consequences pursuant to such terms. We reverse the summary judgment, and remand for further proceedings. Costs are awarded to Madsen. Statutory references are to U.C.A.1953.

Madsens are trustors, and defendant is both the trustee and beneficiary under a deed of trust executed September 21, 1964, for the purpose of securing a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Pacific BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Campbell v. PeterUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1966
  4. Hoyt v. Upper Marion Ditch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Madsen v. Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Duncan Box & Lumber Co. v. Applied Energies, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Murray v. PayneMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Madsen v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Prescott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API