Legal Opinion

Mann v. Whitely

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1931No. 3665PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSadder, J.

The decree from which this appeal is prosecuted foreclosed a mortgage against certain lands in De Baca county. The mortgage was given to secure a series of five notes in the sum of $1,243.12 each, maturing one, two, three, four, and five years after date, respectively. The original mortgagors, makers of the notes, were not joined as defendants. The appellants Whitely were made parties defendant under an allegation of occupancy by them of the premises in question by virtue of a purported contract of purchase from one W. O. Dunlap. He, Dunlap, was joined as a defendant under an allegation that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Rohrer v. DeatherageIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. American Trust & Savings Bank v. ScobeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Moncrieff v. HareSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Keirsey v. HirschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Springer Corp. v. Kirkeby-NatusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Springer Corporation v. Kirkeby-NatusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Conway v. San Miguel County Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API