Legal Opinion

Coburn v. Bartholomew

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1917No. 3010PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Eon. M. L. Ritchie, Judge. Action by J. W. Coburn against Yern Bartholomew. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

On the 31st day of March, 1910, at Burtner, Millard County, this state, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement in words and figures as follows:

“ This memorandum witnesseth that John W. Coburn agrees to purchase at the price of ($1,600) sixteen hundred dollars, the following described real estate situated in the county of Millard, state of Utah, to wit: The S. E. ^4 of the S. W. % of See. 6, T. 17 S., R. 6 W., S. L. M., and Vern Bartholomew agrees to sell said premises at said price and to convey to John W. Coburn, said purchaser, a good title thereon, subject to final proof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bacon v. RaybouldUtah Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. James Pingree Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Campbell v. PeterUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. First National Bank of Salt Lake City v. HaymondUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hammond v. WallUtah Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API