Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brumbaugh

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2003No. 2003-0418PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In December 1992, we suspended respondent, Phillip Brumbaugh of Greenville, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0022652, from the practice of law in Ohio for six months for neglecting entrusted legal matters. Darke Cty. Bar *66Assn. v. Brumbaugh (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 151, 602 N.E.2d 606. We stayed the suspension upon conditions. Id.

{¶ 2} In October 2000, we suspended respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for two years for neglecting entrusted legal matters, but we stayed the suspension upon conditions. Darke Cty. Bar Assn. v. Brumbaugh (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 248, 737 N.E.2d 27.

{¶ 3} On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Akron Bar Ass'n v. HofferOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Richland County Bar Ass'n v. BrickleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. BrickleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Akron Bar Assn. v. HofferOhio Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DoellmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HermanOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API