Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Judge

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2002No. 2002-0681PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 467.] CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. JUDGE. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Judge,

2002-Ohio-4741.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Attorney neglected client, refused to cooperate in the investigation of that misconduct, and has since been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for similar conduct. (No. 2002-0681—Submitted June 5, 2002—Decided October 2, 2002.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 01-89.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Akron Bar Ass'n v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SimecekOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Akron Bar Assn. v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'DiamOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Reinheimer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrumbaughOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API