Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. King

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2004No. 2004-0495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, James C. King of Lima, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0000774, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1967. In January 1990, we suspended respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for one year for violating DR 1-102(A)(4) (forbidding conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation). Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v. King (1990), 48 Ohio St.3d 8, 548 N.E.2d 238. That case arose from respondent’s federal conviction for filing false individual income tax returns in 1984 and 1985. Id. In February 1991, we reinstated respondent to the practice of law in Ohio. Allen Cty. Bar…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. BernSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. SperosOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BowmanOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. FumichOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API