Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Herman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2003No. 2003-0725PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On March 24, 1998, the Auglaize County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, ordered an attorney to draft qualified domestic relations orders (“QDROs”)1 consistent with the terms discussed by the parties at a hearing. The attorney prepared the documents, and he and his client reviewed and signed the QDROs in May 1998. The QDROs were then forwarded to respondent, John Herman of Wapakoneta, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0003056, who was the attorney for the ex-wife of the other attorney’s client. The ex-husband’s attorney instructed respondent to review the documents with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KafantarisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrumbaughOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LaCourOhio Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vardiman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. StephanOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API