McCormick v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, were charged by information filed in the county court of Osage County with the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor. A jury was waived, and the matter first came on for hearing on a motion to suppress certain evidence. The defendants called as a witness A. L. Barger, one of the arresting officers, and thereafter the State called Sid Wilson, the other arresting officer. It was then agreed that the evidence on the motion to suppress might be considered as the evidence in the case.
The court, after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brinegar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Hoppes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Stouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roberson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1957
- Bagwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
- State v. BrindleyConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.