Legal Opinion
Holland v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 3, 1951No. A-11245PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ Ones, P. J.
The defendants, A1 Holland and Howard Barbee, were charged in tbe county court of Comanche county with the unlawful transportation of intoxica-ing liquor; a jury was waived, at the trial the court found each of the defendants guilty and sentenced them to serve 90 days in the county jail and pay a fine of $500.
Prior to the commencement of the trial the defendants presented their separate motions to suppress the evidence, which were overruled. This action of the court is assigned as error.
The evidence of the defendants introduced at the hearing on the motion to suppress showed that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoppes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Brinegar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Grundstrom v. BetoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
- United States v. WareDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.