Legal Opinion

State v. Brindley

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 2, 1963No. FILE Nos. 15392, 15393PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

Both defendants have filed similar motions to suppress the use in court of certain articles proposed to be used as evidence against them. Both contend that these articles were unreasonably seized by the police by means of an unreasonable search in violation of their rights under the fourth amendment to the United States constitution and § 8 of the first article of the Connecticut constitution. These deal, in part, with unreasonable searches and seizures.

Under the aforementioned constitutional provisions, security in their persons, houses, papers and effects is assured the people. Not only the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. State v. MichaelsWashington Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BoykinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Grundstrom v. BetoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
  3. State v. LizotteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. State v. CuellarConnecticut Superior Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API