R.E. ex rel. D.E. v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
R.E., D.E., J.E. and E.E. (hereinafter D.E.1) claim that the State is liable to them for negligently licensing the day care center where J.E. and E.E. were sexually abused. D.E. appeals from the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the State, and from the superior court’s denial of her motion to compel further production of state records.
Because the undisputed facts indicate that the State was not negligent in processing and granting Betty Anderson’s day care license, we affirm the grant of summary judgment to the State. We also affirm the superior…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Ramsey v. City of Sand PointAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Kristin Beul v. Asse International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. SandersAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.