Legal Opinion

Schallert-Ganahl Lumber Co. v. Neal

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1892No. 14788PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order allowing attorneys’ fees. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal, and the facts are as follows: Plaintiffs are material-men, and brought this action to foreclose certain liens for materials furnished defendant Neal. Judgment was recovered as prayed for in the complaint, and upon an appeal to this court, that judgment was affirmed in all respects, except as to an item of $43.50, and to that extent the trial court was directed to modify the judgment. Upon the filing of the remittitur in the lower *193court, the judgment was modified in accordance with the directions therein, and the court also, by an order, allowed the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Empire Gold Mining Co. v. Bonanza Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Rapp v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Dooly v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Hubbard v. DusyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Shaw v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cirimele v. ShinazyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Estate of BevelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Fairbanks v. LampkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API